Mr. Jordan's Representative Matters: PATENT LITIGATION
Fuma International LLC v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
Represented plaintiff Fuma International LLC in seeking $135 million and treble damages against R.J. Reynolds in an e-cigarette patent infringement case in the Middle District of North Carolina. The Court granted summary judgment that R.J. Reynolds infringed Fuma's patents and dismissed R.J. Reynolds' claims that Fuma's patents were invalid due to inequitable conduct. The case was settled shortly before trial.
BMC Software Inc. v. ServiceNow Inc.
Represented plaintiff BMC Software, the leading provider of information technology service management products, against ServiceNow Inc. in a patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas that was resolved by settlement. (Investor’s Business Daily, “ServiceNow Settles Patent Cases With BMC, HPE For $270 Million”). Mr. Jordan also authored Inter-Partes Review responses for BMC before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, obtaining multiple decisions of non-institution.
Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link et. al.
Represented Ericsson in its patent infringement action against Intel, Acer, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba, Netgear, and D-Link involving 802.11n wireless technology. Following a jury trial in the Eastern District of Texas, a jury awarded eight figures to Ericsson for the defendants’ infringement of Ericsson’s patented technology.
Global Sessions, LP v. Amazon et al.
Represented plaintiff Global Sessions in the Eastern District of Texas against multiple on-line retailers in a case asserting infringement of patents related to maintaining session state for a user of a website and managing a web system. The case was resolved favorably to Global Sessions.
LML Patent Corp. v. J.P. Morgan et al.
Represented plaintiff LML, a Canada-based provider of financial payment processing solutions, in the Eastern District of Texas against multiple banking defendants in a case asserting infringement of a patent related to electronic funds transfer. The case was resolved favorably to LML.
Juniper Networks Inc. v. Bahattab
Represented the inventor of statistical routing techniques in a declaratory judgment action filed by Juniper, a multinational network device manufacturer, in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Mr. Jordan successfully defended the patent at oral argument, defeating Juniper’s motion for summary judgment that the patent was invalid.
MR. JORDAN'S REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
In Re Certain MLC Flash Memory Devices
Represented complainant BTG International in proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission against Samsung, Apple, Dell, and other respondents for patent infringement involving multi-level cell flash memory chips used in MP3 players, cameras, and laptops that was resolved by settlement. (Law360, “Samsung Settles ITC Complaint Over Flash Memory”).
In Re Certain Communication Equipment
Represented complainant ChriMar against Hewlett Packard, Cisco, and other respondents in proceedings for patent infringement involving Power over Ethernet technology.
In Re Certain Devices for Mobile Data Communication
Represented complainant Openwave against Apple and Research In Motion in patent infringement proceedings involving mobile handset and networking technology.
Mr. Jordan's Representative Matters: Cyber Law
Certification Trendz, Ltd. v. Yanan Feng, et al.
Microsoft v. Shahzad Shahnawaz et al. (W.D. Wash.)
Certification Trendz, Ltd. v. Avanset Corp. et al.
Represented plaintiff Certification Trendz in the Eastern District of Virginia against individuals in China passing off products using Certification Trendz’s trademarks. The court granted a preliminary injunction against the defendants, awarded fees due to defendants’ failure to respond to discovery, and defendants settled on favorable terms while Certification Trendz’s motion to hold defendants in contempt of violating the court’s injunction was pending.
Certification Trendz, Ltd. v. Avanset Corp. et al.
Microsoft v. Shahzad Shahnawaz et al. (W.D. Wash.)
Certification Trendz, Ltd. v. Avanset Corp. et al.
Represented Certification Trendz in the Eastern District of Virginia involving copyright and trademark infringement by a group of defendants, primarily Russian individuals. On plaintiff’s motions, the court denied defendants’ motion to quash service, issued a preliminary injunction against defendants, struck several of defendants’ affirmative defenses, and granted an adverse inference instruction against defendants due to discovery misconduct. During Certification Trendz’s pending motion to hold defendants in contempt for violating the preliminary injunction, the case settled on favorable terms.
Microsoft v. Shahzad Shahnawaz et al. (W.D. Wash.)
Microsoft v. Shahzad Shahnawaz et al. (W.D. Wash.)
Microsoft v. Shahzad Shahnawaz et al. (W.D. Wash.)
Represented defendants in copyright infringement suits brought by Microsoft, Cisco and others, in each case preserving defendants’ rights to conduct business.
Microsoft v. Shahzad Shahnawaz et al. (W.D. Wash.); President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Certplex Ltd. et al. (D. Mass.); Cisco Technology, Inc. v. Certification Trendz Ltd. et al. (D. Conn.)